Steve Atkins wrote: > On Aug 19, 2010, at 12:56 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > >> Folks, >> >> Please. Let's get back to the work at hand and not >> spend time on this, > > Encouraging use of DKIM, and avoiding confusion > between ADSP flaws and DKIM flaws is a big part > of the work at hand, I think. If it's not, it should be.
Well, unfortunately, 5+ years of work seems to show that hasn't been possible. I doubt it will ever be possible to ignore what are not subtle flaws but obvious protocol consistency flaws between WG documents and ignoring the comments clearly hasn't help as well. Can't blame me. I can step away and the bugs are still there. :) -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html