I'd like some help tackling the next version of the MLM draft. People seem to have varying ideas about what should be removed and perhaps appear in other documents now. I need some consensus on a direction in which to proceed.
So can I please get some +1s/-1s on each of the following: (1) Split the document into three documents: A DKIM MLM BCP that discusses signing and verifying in the context of MLMs with no value-add items addressed, a DKIM MLM Informational that discusses possible value-add enhancements to MLMs in the DKIM world, and a non-WG BCP about mailing lists irrespective of DKIM (Dave's proposal); (2) Tear out everything having to do with making author signatures survive list relaying, dropping all that text altogether, and instead pointing people at S/MIME or PGP (John's proposal); (3) Something else (and specify what that might be). AND... If you support any of the above, please take a few minutes to include some pointers to what text you want changed/exported and in what way. Actual diffs would be ideal, but I'll take point-form commentary as well. AND... If you advocate for a general MLM BCP, this will be a non-WG document (it's outside of our charter) so I'd love to get some MLM operators and developers involved. (Maybe this should take place on ietf-822 or maybe on a new non-WG list; suggestions welcome.) Expressions of interest in that work would be appreciated. I'll approach the APPS ADs about a venue. Thanks, -MSK
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html