On 8/30/2010 11:42 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> I'd suggest that the second item actually be a normative specification of >> value-added features. This requires a change to the charter, and so it >> would have to wait until completing the current charter. > > If it's a minor charter tweak, maybe we could start that process before > then?
'minor' and 'charter change' in the same sentence constitute an oxymoron. it's a formal ietf process. perhaps more importantly, i'll suggest it's a distraction from our current work. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
