J.D. Falk wrote:
> On Aug 30, 2010, at 11:36 PM, Daniel Black wrote:
>
>> ANNEX A - MUA Considerations
>
> Is a draft about mailing lists the right place to make
> recommendations to MUA developers? Seems like those should probably
> be in a separate document.
>
> (This is not to say that I disagree with the recommendations
> themselves, of course.)
Ideally, we need another "bible" like the classic RFC 1123:
Requirements for Internet Hosts -- Application and Support
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1123.txt
which put it all together for Internet Hosting systems. RFC 1123 was
especially helpful for integrated operations and systems.
Too many documents, too many of one altering or updating the other and
unfortunately sometimes incoherently and inconsistently.
While I personally believe the current documents on the WG table
should be "fixed" to codify the engineering semantics, if that can't
happen (and doubt it will), a document that puts it all together like
a RFC 1103 for DKIM operations on both the HOST and CLIENT side would
be very valuable.
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
