On Sep 4, 2010, at 9:31 PM, Steve Atkins wrote: > The whole point of rotating keys is so that loss of an old private key > isn't a risk. Given that, I think that even if you're fairly sure that a key > pair hasn't been compromised then you should remove the public > key as soon as is reasonable after you stop signing with the private > key - as the private key continues to be a high value target until > the public key is removed. > > Eight days is as short as I'm comfortable with, so that's as soon > as is reasonable for me.
...but what would be "as long as I'm comfortable with"? Have we seen DKIM private keys compromised due in large part to leaving the public keys in rotation for too long... and what was "too long" in those instances. I'd be surprised to discover many senders are rotating keys every eight days. -- Brett _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
