> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim- > boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of John R. Levine > Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 12:23 PM > To: J.D. Falk > Cc: DKIM List > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-02 review > > >> How about: "It is important to us that this arrive at your inbox > signed by us and unmodified. You should not keep it if that is not the > case." > > Well OK. Now I'm hearing that it's the signature that's important, not > the message. No disagreement there.
Since the signature's success is predicated on [some part of] the body being immutable in transit, are those distinct? _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
