On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote: > On 24/Sep/10 17:06, Dave CROCKER wrote: >> On 9/24/2010 7:52 AM, Jeff Macdonald wrote: >>>> It may be productive if we distinguish between two-way discussion lists >>>> where participants send mail to the list, and one-way broadcast lists >>>> where >>>> only the owner (or their agent) sends mail to the list. >>>> >>>> The difference between these is to be large enough that the concepts do >>>> not >>>> generalize that well. >>> >>> Since I work for an ESP, I agree with this statement. > > Do concepts generalize enough to allow issuing > draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists also for these "authoring" MLMs? I agree > that some solutions, e.g. publishing a key on behalf of an MLM, suit > ESPs better than regular mailing lists; but why is it important to > differentiate them, given that, in principle, the solution could work > for both?
I don't think ESPs fit into this draft at all. I believe the draft should just target MLMs that re-author the original message. -- Jeff Macdonald Ayer, MA _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
