On 10/14/2010 9:05 AM, Tony Hansen wrote: > Is it still worth changing that section into a WARNING > for people upgrading from DomainKeys, saying to make darn sure that they > REMOVE g=; in their old DNS records because of interoperability issues? > > So the question becomes: if we remove the section on how DKIM and DK can > play nice together, 1) do we chop out all references to DomainKeys, or > 2) do we keep a short warning on what needs to be changed in the DK > record to make it work with DKIM?
For pragmatic guidance text that is not essential for direct implementation, I'm finding myself increasingly fond of the idea of putting such wisdom into the Deployment document... d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
