> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] > On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER > Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 5:08 AM > To: IETF DKIM WG > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] removing the g= definition? > > On 10/14/2010 12:46 AM, Tony Hansen wrote: > > Another potential option is to remove g= entirely: > > I'd like to encourage our considering this strongly, for two reasons: > [...]
I'd support this. Our statistics show that its use other than "g=*" or "g=" with DK back-compatibility is vanishingly small (when I looked last night, 7 out of 300,000 keys retrieved made use of it by actually naming something there). _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
