On Monday, October 18, 2010 02:19:06 pm Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org > > [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman > > Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2010 11:56 AM > > To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org > > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] sophistry is bad, was Data integrity claims > > > > > The current DKIM spec does not answer these questions and easily > > > permits protecting very little of the message. Almost certainly too > > > little to ensure the protection you assert. > > > > One can also point a gun at ones own head. That doesn't make a gun a > > suicide device of no value for anything else. The spec does permit > > people to do silly things, but so what. > > Doesn't this statement advocate for informative advice rather than > normative requirements?
I'm OK with that, but the informative advice needs to be in security considerations, IMO. Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
