> Adding and removing Authentication-Results is probably the most common > modification. Removing header garbage may also be fairly popular, dunno. > Why do you think it's bad?
Adding A-R is fine. Messing with the message otherwise is more help than I want from DKIM. > At any rate, the paragraph I was referring to is > > The verifier MAY treat unsigned header fields with extreme > skepticism, including marking them as untrusted or even deleting them > before display to the end user. That's an example of the bad advice that I think we should drop from 4871bis. It does nothing to improve robustness or interoperability, just offers unsolicited advice to MUA developers. Regards, John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
