Thanks, Bill, Mark and Byung-Hee for the warm welcome. Yes, we gotta start something somewhere and glad to let you know that we are staring something here. If possible, let's work together for the spread out in eastern asia, Byung-Hee.
Well, let me give you the first feedback of what's been discussed at the point of implementation here, and I would like to ask your opinions. Here is our stuation. Members of dkim.jp so far circulate somewhat like 30% of domestic emails and a lot more forged emails coming from overseas, especially forged @yahoo.co.jp and @rakuten.co.jp. So with the initiative of those two companies and others, we got together to get rid of those forged emails. Senders in dkim.jp are committed to attach DKIM signature withing 6 months, and possibly ready to write their ADSP "discardable". Since we have major ISPs on our member list and they are very willing to discard unveryfied emails, no surprise about it :-), we are trying to inch up to the level where all domestic emails are signed and verified. But there is a small problem. It is rather polical. We have a telecommunication law that allows ISPs to discard forged email, but our Ministry so far does not acknowledge that failure of DKIM verification immediately equals to forgery, because there could be other reasons to fail. We can fight about it taking time to get through to dull Japanese bureaucracy, but I think there is a faster way. It is to let senders to have an option to declare that if there is no DKIM signature at all, verifiers can discard those messages. Then we can shut their mouths insisting there could be other reasons. So, my point is that what do you think of the idea to have an new entry in ADSP "discard-if-no-sig", which allows senders to declare messages without DKIM signature should be discarded? If that's possible, it makes our job a lot easier and faster. Thanks, Tsuneki Ohnishi > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:49:36AM +0900, Tsuneki Ohnishi allegedly wrote: >> >> Hi to all, >> >> I am Tsuneki Ohnishi and I would like to let you know >> that DKIM Japan(dkim.jp) has just been set up as of >> Nov 15, 2010. > > Welcome, Tsuneki, glad to have you join. It's great news to hear of > such commitment. > > Who knows? Maybe .jp will be the first ccTLD to get comprehensive DKIM > coverage. Wouldn't that be something! > > > Mark. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html