On 11/Jan/11 20:15, John R. Levine wrote: >> The new docs willuse the CORRECTED rfc4871bis text. > > Considering how far along we are with rfc4871bis, and keeping mind mind > the objections from Jim and others, my inclination would be to finish and > publish rfc4871bis as a standalone document, and after that do the DOSETA > document that, as I understand it, pulls out components of DKIM and > defines interfaces to them as a toolkit.
+1, considering that the current rfc4871bis is the result of a merge, publishing the intermediate step before a further split will ease future comparisons (as they won't have to go down to draft records.) _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
