>Furthermore, I'm not sure whether the DKIM WG has concluded on >thinking about the value of DKIM, what it can be used for. Is it's >purpose limited to providing input to a reputation engine? Is that >it? Or is there more than that?
Those are all interesting questions, but I don't see what they have to do with standards development. If at some point in the future we figure out something where there would be a benefit if everyone did it the same way, we can charter a son-of-DKIM group to work on it. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
