Plus, the future of DKIM doesn't have to come from this WG. If there's momentum to be preserved, interested people can spin up a DKIMbis WG or something similar. The domain reputation stuff and DOSETA both have people talking at the IETF, for example. ________________________________________ From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of John R. Levine [jo...@iecc.com] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 2:40 PM To: Rolf E. Sonneveld Cc: DKIM List Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Work group future
> By closing down the WG the momentum will be lost; There's plenty of momementum in MAAWG and other operational fora. The IETF is about standards development. You don't get deployment by keeping a standards WG going. Regards, John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html