On 03/31/2011 02:33 PM, Jim Fenton wrote: > The direction of the DKIM specifications since RFC 4871 have been to > rely less and less on the AUID (agent or user identifier, the i= value > on the signature) to the point that it provides no security benefit. >
The working group was bamboozled into the false dilemma that DKIM had to produce a singular "output". It has all gone down hill from there. Things that use heuristics like spam filters thrive with more information, and suffer with less. So we've destroyed information in the name of aesthetics while the main consumers of the output thrive on the messy details. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html