Dave CROCKER wrote: > The distinction that needs to be made is between formally-specified output > vs. > implementation-specific access to DKIM internals. >
i= was never intended to be "DKIM internals". That's why the entire gambit to make d= the only show in town sucked. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
