> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] > On Behalf Of Franck Martin > Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 3:21 AM > To: John Levine > Cc: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value) > > I'm curious of the reasons too, I see some data points, but cannot > conclude any statistics... > > May be from the people who do statistics on DKIM, do you see a fair > percentage of DKIM signed sub-domains?
I'm happy to search our data if you can describe what I'm looking for. If you're referring to a comparison between "d=" and "i=" values, we do that already: http://www.opendkim.org/stats/report.html#i_tag (The anchor tag in the current report has a typo, so if you go before the next update, you'll need to search for "i=" yourself.) If you mean something else, describe for me what you're looking for and I'll give it a go. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
