----- Original Message ----- > From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <m...@cloudmark.com> > To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org > Sent: Tuesday, 5 April, 2011 6:27:22 AM > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value) > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org > > [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Franck Martin > > Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 3:21 AM > > To: John Levine > > Cc: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org > > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value) > > > > I'm curious of the reasons too, I see some data points, but cannot > > conclude any statistics... > > > > May be from the people who do statistics on DKIM, do you see a fair > > percentage of DKIM signed sub-domains? > > I'm happy to search our data if you can describe what I'm looking for. > If you're referring to a comparison between "d=" and "i=" values, we > do that already: > > http://www.opendkim.org/stats/report.html#i_tag > > (The anchor tag in the current report has a typo, so if you go before > the next update, you'll need to search for "i=" yourself.) > > If you mean something else, describe for me what you're looking for > and I'll give it a go. > the question is: What are the domains that use a sub-domain for d= ?
for gTLDs, what are the instances of d= where there are 3 levels in the domain where the 2nd and 1st level is identical. eg: d=mail1.example.com d=mail2.example.com d=mail3.example.com We could infer that example.com use different mail streams as they use different sub-domains to sign their emails for ccTLDs, in general you need to go one level deeper eg: d=mail1.example.com.au d=mail2.example.com.au d=mail3.example.com.au _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
