> Internationalized domain names MUST be converted as described in Section > 2.3 of [RFC5890] to "A-Labels" > '--- > > This failed to specify Fake A-Labels should not be permitted. The point > made by Ticket #17. RFC5980 introduces restrictions against 3,329 > confusable unicode points not excluded by RFC3490. Unless A-label > validity checks are made by DKIM, it is not reasonable to assume > RFC5980's added protection are afforded
The consensus of the working group, and the guidance from the IESG, was to allow RFC 5890 and its co-documents to specify the internationalization aspects. It is well out of scope for DKIM to try to do it. I have seen no support for expanding the statement beyond what's covered by ticket #4. I'm happy to re-open ticket #17, and leave it open until WGLC ends, but unless there's clear support for it, it will then be closed again. Barry, as chair _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
