On Apr 29, 2011, at 12:32 PM, John R. Levine wrote: > On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > >>> On further consideration, I'm with Dave. Suggest removing the current >>> language about l= and MIME boundaries, and replace with a note that if you >>> use l=, added content can change the appearance of a message in hard to >>> anticipate ways. >> >> Replace the whole section with just that, or only the first paragraph? > > Sheesh, you actually want me to read the thing? Oh, all right. > > In 4.4.5, delete " Signers > of MIME messages that include a body length count SHOULD be sure that > the length extends to the closing MIME boundary string." > > Also delete the subsequent INFORMATIVE IMPLEMENTATION NOTE. > > The note earlier in the section says the bad guy can replace the displayed > contents, so I don't think we need to say it again.
+1 to three changes above. -- J.D. Falk the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
