> -----Original Message----- > From: Hector Santos [mailto:hsan...@isdg.net] > Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 5:33 PM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy > Cc: Murray S. Kucherawy; ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output summary - proposing ODID "Originating Domain > Identity" > > Here is the correct message link: > > Status and direction > http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2009q1/011194.html
That message (a) was sent six months before ADSP was published, and (b) was written at a time when ADSP still made use of "i=". If you take the time to read the text in RFC5617, it doesn't use "i=" at all. > For all and intent and purposes, this message can be reposted today > and still bee relevant, ...except that it doesn't cover what the working group actually published. > covering the final issues we are still dealing > with. Note the chairs recommended move forward items, in particular > #4 which is what I believe we are trying to help with in this WGLC: > > 4. *Aim 4871bis at incorporating what we've learned since 4871.* > If that results in a document that can and should move to > Draft Standard, we'll do that. If it does not, then 4871bis > will go to Proposed Standard, and it will take another > round of work to move up the standards track. Sounds like precisely what we've done. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
