On 05/04/2011 09:14 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > I've uploaded Murray's helpful effort to the DKIM site: > > <http://dkim.org/specs/rfc4871-to-bis02-diff.htm> > > I had assumed that the complete diff would be unreadable, which is why I > originally put up the incremental diffs. > > However in looking through the complete diff, I'm surprised to discover that > it > is quite easy to see and evaluate all of the changes. > > We really ought to stop responding to criticisms that provide no > substantiation. > For criticism to be constructive, it needs to contain meaningful substance. > > Complaining is easy; substantiating criticism takes effort. >
44 pages of diffs. That is not by stretch of the imagination inconsequential. I count at least two new normative changes -- in informational notes of all places -- by scanning *half* the document, both of which are wrong. And that does not count the normative change with Output. Thanks for reinforcing my impression that this is a process run amok. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
