> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Thomas [mailto:m...@mtcc.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 10:21 AM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy > Cc: dcroc...@bbiw.net; ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output summary - proposing ODID "Originating Domain > Identity" > > >> 44 pages of diffs. > >> > > Updating an RFC number causes a diff. That's not a valid metric. > > These aren't updates to just the rfc number though. This document > has been changing and changing and changing up until the weeks > before last call, and through last call. It's impossible to keep up with > unless it is your full time job, which it most certainly isn't in my case -- > unless you can figure out how this relates to public key substitution > attacks in android market in-app purchases. > > That is why I'm so alarmed.
Ah, you deftly avoided my question: You said: > >> I count at least two new normative changes -- in informational notes of > >> all places -- by scanning > >> *half* the document, both of which are wrong. What were the two normative changes in informational notes that were wrong in the half of the document you scanned? _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
