On 05/04/2011 11:26 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote: >> It's because I didn't want to imply that those were the only two. > > This is quite a remarkable premise for refusing to provide concrete > substance. > > I'm trying to imagine how a working group could ever make progress, > were this premise prevalent. Don't offer substance without providing > a massive tome to cover everything that qualifies it enough to avoid > misunderstanding what hasn't been said... >
More ad-hominems. I've written a DKIM stack. The first one in fact, followed a week or so later testing with Murray. Call it an argument from authority, but I at least have some experience in what subtle and seemingly inconsequential wording changes can do to implementations. 44 pages of diffs scares the living hell out of me. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
