> We are spending an awful amount of time on this l= issue, whether it should > be pulled, keep it and explaining how bad it is and discourage usage.
Agreed. I would like to deprecate it. But we don't have consensus for going that far, and I think we're too late in the process to get ourselves mired in that. What we're doing now is just short of deprecating it -- saying that, well, you really shouldn't oughta use it, without being normative. > The 6% using "l=" needlessly is a red flag. Yep. Happily, we (where "we", here, mostly means Murray, but some others as well) are collecting stats. It's possible, later, for someone to create an individual submission for "DKIM l= Considered Harmful", or some such, and perhaps if/when someone ever moves DKIM to full Standard we can actually deprecate l=. Barry, as participant _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html