> This is a valid point. Sean, please consider that the working group > did not discuss the possibility of changing the status from BCP to > Proposed Standard. You might remove that from the writeup.
I suspect you would find signficant objection to making it a PS. Considering how little of the advice is based on actual practice, even BCP is a stretch. Regards, John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
