John R. Levine wrote: >> This is a valid point. Sean, please consider that the working group >> did not discuss the possibility of changing the status from BCP to >> Proposed Standard. You might remove that from the writeup. > > I suspect you would find signficant objection to making it a PS. > > Considering how little of the advice is based on actual practice, even BCP > is a stretch.
G-d! and I was deathly afraid to comment on the same thing! So I'm happy you said it! -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
