> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim- > boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of SM > Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 9:27 AM > To: DKIM List > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] discardable, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim- > mailinglists-10.txt> (DKIM And Mailing Lists) to BCP > > At 05:22 16-05-2011, John R. Levine wrote: > >I realize there are people who wish it meant something else, typically > >simultaneously saying "this mail is very important" and "throw this > mail > >away", which is absurd, or perhaps "if there's no signature, handle it > > Yes. > > >The definition in the RFC was hammered out after a great deal of > debate, > >and I see no evidence that the definition is defective. ADSP has > plenty > >of problems, but the definition of discardable isn't one of them. > > I don't see any value in reopening a discussion about the definition. > > Regards, > -sm >
+1 Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
