> -----Original Message----- > From: John Levine [mailto:jo...@iecc.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 7:20 PM > To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org > Cc: Murray S. Kucherawy > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] 8bit downgrades > > I think Pete's analysis is correct, but my advice would be to take > it out altogether. We don't have any great insight into the warts > of what paths are likely to downcode a message and what paths aren't, > so I would prefer not to purport to offer advice about it.
Actually, I kinda prefer to leave it in. It seems to me "assume a downgrade will happen unless you're certain it won't, and plan accordingly" is good advice without having to know the details of a transport path. And the paragraph gives discussion of the how and why. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
