On Friday, May 20, 2011 01:18:39 AM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: John Levine [mailto:jo...@iecc.com] > > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 7:20 PM > > To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org > > Cc: Murray S. Kucherawy > > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] 8bit downgrades > > > > I think Pete's analysis is correct, but my advice would be to take > > it out altogether. We don't have any great insight into the warts > > of what paths are likely to downcode a message and what paths aren't, > > so I would prefer not to purport to offer advice about it. > > Actually, I kinda prefer to leave it in. It seems to me "assume a > downgrade will happen unless you're certain it won't, and plan > accordingly" is good advice without having to know the details of a > transport path. And the paragraph gives discussion of the how and why.
+1. Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
