On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Douglas Otis wrote: > The outcome in either "except-mlist" or "all" remains beyond the > sender's control.
"except-mlist" is no worse here than "unknown", which is what the vast majority of domains will be publishing in the absence of the "except-mlist" option. > The sender benefits so let the senders do the work. A win-win for both > the sender and the recipient. For most domains, the sender benefits are not sufficient to motivate a "discardable" or TPA deployment. And with neither TPA, "discardable" nor "except-mlist" in common use, paying attention to ADSP isn't worth an MX admin's time. The sender loses utterly. ---- Michael Deutschmann <mich...@talamasca.ocis.net> _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
