+1
/d -- Dave Crocker bbiw.net -----Original Message----- From: Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> To: RFC Errata System <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> Cc: "dcroc...@bbiw.net" <dcroc...@bbiw.net>, "tony+dki...@maillennium.att.com" <tony+dki...@maillennium.att.com>, "m...@cloudmark.com" <m...@cloudmark.com>, "stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie" <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie>, "turn...@ieca.com" <turn...@ieca.com>, "barryle...@computer.org" <barryle...@computer.org>, "john.hawth...@gmail.com" <john.hawth...@gmail.com>, "ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org" <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org> Sent: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 3:25 PM Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (3192) I've checked this, and it's correct. We copied the examples from 4871, and made the editorial error of adding a space without changing the hash. I'll mark it as Verified if i hear no objections soon. Barry On Saturday, April 14, 2012, RFC Errata System wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6376, > "DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6376&eid=3192 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: John Hawthorn <john.hawth...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > > Section: Appendix A > > Original Text > ------------- > From: Joe SixPack <j...@football.example.com <javascript:;>> > To: Suzie Q <su...@shopping.example.net <javascript:;>> > Subject: Is dinner ready? > Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 21:00:37 -0700 (PDT) > Message-ID: <20030712040037.46341.5...@football.example.com<javascript:;> > > > > Hi. > > We lost the game. Are you hungry yet? > > Joe. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > From: Joe SixPack <j...@football.example.com <javascript:;>> > To: Suzie Q <su...@shopping.example.net <javascript:;>> > Subject: Is dinner ready? > Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 21:00:37 -0700 (PDT) > Message-ID: <20030712040037.46341.5...@football.example.com<javascript:;> > > > > Hi. > > We lost the game. Are you hungry yet? > > Joe. > > Notes > ----- > This text appears three times, in A.1., A.2., and A.3. > Notice the double space after "game.", which renders the body hashes from > A.2. and A.3. invalid. > The corrected text is the same as that in RFC 4871. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6376 (draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-15) > -------------------------------------- > Title : DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures > Publication Date : September 2011 > Author(s) : D. Crocker, Ed., T. Hansen, Ed., M. Kucherawy, Ed. > Category : DRAFT STANDARD > Source : Domain Keys Identified Mail > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
