On 4/16/2012 8:10 AM, RFC Editor wrote: > Just a heads up that we will be reviewing this one internally with the > team to raise our awareness of the issue. Additionally, we agree with > Dave, and encourage the inclusion of notes to help avoid such errors > in the future.
My guess is that the existing notation for communicating inline to the RFC editor is sufficient. That is, I'd expect the real issue being one of getting us all to tell you what not to format, rather than one of creating a new notation. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
