I also agree with this proposal. I don't have much to add over the text in the formal request; it lays out the case based on my experience implementing DKIM and ADSP in open source. I can also say that I have never encountered an operation that actively uses it, including current and previous employers.
-MSK On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Terry Zink <tz...@exchange.microsoft.com>wrote: > I agree with this proposal. > > -- Terry > > -----Original Message----- > From: apps-discuss-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-boun...@ietf.org] > On Behalf Of Dave Crocker > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 4:52 PM > To: DKIM IETF WG; Apps Discuss > Subject: [apps-discuss] Fwd: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic > > Folks, > > Barry has agreed to sponsor the enclosed status change. > > He would like to see discussion formal request. > > (If you've already responded to my /in/formal query earlier today on the > dmarc@ietf list, please now lodge any formal comments you wish to make on > either of the two lists here. > > d/ > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Request to move RFC 5617 (ADSP) to Historic > Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:09:14 -0700 > From: Dave Crocker <dcroc...@bbiw.net> > Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking > To: Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org>, Pete Resnick < > resn...@episteme-software.com> > > Folks, > > This is a formal request, to have DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Author > Domain Signing Practices (ADSP) (RFC 5617) moved to Historic status. > > It has garnered almost no deployment and use, in the 4 years since its > advancement to IETF Proposed Standard. > > In addition, newer work, DMARC, covers the same general email functional > area and already has garnered quite a bit of deployment and use. Hence it > will clarify things for the marketplace to remove standards status from the > apparently-competing, but actually-useless ADSP specification. > > Today I sent a query to the MAAWG Technical committee and the IETF DMARC > mailing lists, to assess support for the status change. Within only a few > hours, I've already seen quite a few +1s, and no -1s. > > Thanks. > > > d/ > > -- > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net > _______________________________________________ > apps-discuss mailing list > apps-disc...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss > _______________________________________________ > apps-discuss mailing list > apps-disc...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss >
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
