On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> wrote:
> The list of things DMARC does that ADSP doesn't in its appendix, is a trip > down memory lane > of constraints that were placed on it by the > against-it-before-they-were-for it set. True > SPF wasn't ever on its radar -- SPF has its own policy language, so nobody > wanted to touch > that. And ARF was progressing at the time as it's own spec, so we weren't > completely clueless > about its need. But instead of actually working to make a better spec at > the time, we had an > author whose goal was to subvert it, and endless idiotic flamewars about > what the actual name > of the draft should be as the main priorities. The really sad thing about > this is that they pissed > away 6+ years due to the intrigue. > I'm lost. What's the purpose of this branch of the original thread, other than venting old frustration and lobbing invective? -MSK
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
