On 9/12/13 12:28 PM, Dave Crocker wrote: > On 9/12/2013 12:20 PM, Jim Fenton wrote: > >> I will note that vanilla, uncustomized SpamAssassin does implement ADSP, >> so there might be more checking of ADSP records than some realize. See, >> for example: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED > > There seems to be a pattern that has developed, of demanding that > failure mean literally no adoption. It doesn't mean that. It means > that it has no community traction. ADSP more than qualifies on the > pragmatics of failure.
This was a response to your statement to Barry and Pete, "It has garnered almost no deployment and use." If that comment was relevant, so is a comment that there is, in fact, some deployment. -Jim _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
