On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:13:43 -0700, Christian Huitema wrote: >>Well, I am mostly concerned to see "SOAP over BEEP" defined >> before we define the alternative "SOAP over TCP". Is that the real root of your objections? It is obvious that a small SOAP over BEEP spec will be written quicker that a huge SOAP over TCP spec, since the latter has to effectively duplicate most of what is in RFC 3080. That is the whole reason we take a layering approach to these things and it is becoming clear it is better. Eamon
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Prop... Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to ... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP... Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP... Mark Baker
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: Using SOA... Mark Baker
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stan... Eamon O'Tuathail
- Re-visiting the jutification for BEEP Dave Crocker
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stan... Christian Huitema
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stan... Eamon O'Tuathail
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stan... Eamon O'Tuathail
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stan... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stan... Christian Huitema
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed... Marshall T. Rose
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed... Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stan... Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Prop... Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to ... Brian E Carpenter
- Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard Tony . Coates
