Brian, >So, we continue to have all the criticisms of this proposal focus on >everything except the technical details of this proposal. How constructive. I apologize for the closing outburst. I hit send too quickly and did not proofread my note carefully enough. Being frustrated is not an excuse for being rude. d/ ---------- Dave Crocker <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com> tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.273.6464
- Re: Last Call: Using SOA... Mark Baker
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stan... Eamon O'Tuathail
- Re-visiting the jutification for BEEP Dave Crocker
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stan... Christian Huitema
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stan... Eamon O'Tuathail
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stan... Eamon O'Tuathail
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stan... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stan... Christian Huitema
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed... Marshall T. Rose
- RE: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed... Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stan... Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Prop... Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to ... Brian E Carpenter
- Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard Tony . Coates
- Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Stan... Eamon O'Tuathail
