<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > given that the only document out of EAI that has made > it to RFC status is an informational overview
The next two EAI Last Calls started yesterday, there can be four EAI RFCs soon. I'm very curious what you think about the one or two "experimental MIME updates" in the EAI I-Ds. For one (= ignoring an "expressly forbidden") I think it is actually only a subtle error in RFC 2045. For the other (= UTF-8 in MIME part headers) I fear it could cause havoc, and is unnecessary for EAI. Please tell me that this is a hallucination on my side, and no real EAI design issue. Frank
