ietf-smtp  

Messages by Date

• 2010/10/19 Re: ABNF in RFC5321 Tony Hansen
• 2010/10/19 Re: ABNF in RFC5321 Tony Finch
• 2010/10/19 Re: ABNF in RFC5321 Tony Hansen
• 2010/10/19 Re: ABNF in RFC5321 Tony Finch
• 2010/10/18 Re: ABNF in RFC5321 SM
• 2010/10/18 Re: ABNF in RFC5321 John C Klensin
• 2010/10/18 Re: ABNF in RFC5321 Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• 2010/10/18 ABNF in RFC5321 Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2010/09/16 Fwd: NomCom 2010-2011: Call for More Nominations Tony Hansen
• 2010/09/14 01 version of draft-macdonald-antispam-registry Jeff Macdonald
• 2010/09/14 draft-macdonald-antispam-registry and Subject code 8 Jeff Macdonald
• 2010/08/15 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay Hector Santos
• 2010/08/15 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay David MacQuigg
• 2010/08/15 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA Hector Santos
• 2010/08/15 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA Carl S. Gutekunst
• 2010/08/14 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA Дилян Палаузов
• 2010/08/14 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA David MacQuigg
• 2010/08/14 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA Hector Santos
• 2010/08/14 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA Дилян Палаузов
• 2010/08/14 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA Hector Santos
• 2010/08/13 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay Alessandro Vesely
• 2010/08/13 Re: NDNs considered harmful Hector Santos
• 2010/08/13 Re: NDNs considered harmful Peter J. Holzer
• 2010/08/13 Call Back Verification (was: NDNs considered harmful) Peter J. Holzer
• 2010/08/13 Re: NDNs considered harmful Hector Santos
• 2010/08/13 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA Tony Finch
• 2010/08/13 Re: NDNs considered harmful Rich Kulawiec
• 2010/08/13 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA Nathaniel Borenstein
• 2010/08/13 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA Ray Bellis
• 2010/08/13 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA Carl S. Gutekunst
• 2010/08/12 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA Ray Bellis
• 2010/08/12 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA Hector Santos
• 2010/08/12 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA Carl S. Gutekunst
• 2010/08/12 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA John Levine
• 2010/08/12 Re: NDNs considered harmful Hector Santos
• 2010/08/12 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA Carl S. Gutekunst
• 2010/08/12 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA ned+ietf-smtp
• 2010/08/12 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA ned+ietf-smtp
• 2010/08/12 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA Douglas Otis
• 2010/08/12 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA Steve Atkins
• 2010/08/12 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA Carl S. Gutekunst
• 2010/08/12 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA John R Levine
• 2010/08/12 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA Dave CROCKER
• 2010/08/12 RE: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay ned+ietf-smtp
• 2010/08/12 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA ned+ietf-smtp
• 2010/08/12 Re: NDNs considered harmful Rich Kulawiec
• 2010/08/12 Re: NDNs considered harmful Hector Santos
• 2010/08/12 Re: NDNs considered harmful Hector Santos
• 2010/08/12 Re: NDNs considered harmful ned+ietf-smtp
• 2010/08/12 Re: NDNs considered harmful Paul Smith
• 2010/08/12 Re: NDNs considered harmful Hector Santos
• 2010/08/12 Re: NDNs considered harmful Derek J. Balling
• 2010/08/12 Re: Processing after the end of DATA ned+ietf-smtp
• 2010/08/12 Re: NDNs considered harmful Paul Smith
• 2010/08/12 Re: NDNs considered harmful John R Levine
• 2010/08/12 Re: NDNs considered harmful Paul Smith
• 2010/08/12 Re: NDNs considered harmful ned+ietf-smtp
• 2010/08/12 Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft SM
• 2010/08/12 Re: NDNs considered harmful Hector Santos
• 2010/08/12 Re: NDNs considered harmful Hector Santos
• 2010/08/12 Re: NDNs considered harmful Hector Santos
• 2010/08/12 Re: NDNs considered harmful Derek J. Balling
• 2010/08/12 RE: NDNs considered harmful John R Levine
• 2010/08/12 Re: NDNs considered harmful Paul Smith
• 2010/08/12 RE: NDNs considered harmful Rosenwald, Jordan
• 2010/08/12 Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft John C Klensin
• 2010/08/11 Re: mail proxies, Processing after the end of DATA John Levine
• 2010/08/11 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay John Levine
• 2010/08/11 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay Hector Santos
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Tony Finch
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Hector Santos
• 2010/08/11 RE: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay Tony Finch
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Steve Atkins
• 2010/08/11 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay Tony Finch
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Tony Finch
• 2010/08/11 Re: NDNs considered harmful John Levine
• 2010/08/11 Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA John Levine
• 2010/08/11 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay Jeff Macdonald
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Tony Finch
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Hector Santos
• 2010/08/11 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay Steve Atkins
• 2010/08/11 Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft Jeff Macdonald
• 2010/08/11 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay Jeff Macdonald
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA ned+ietf-smtp
• 2010/08/11 Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft SM
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA David MacQuigg
• 2010/08/11 Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft Hector Santos
• 2010/08/11 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay Hector Santos
• 2010/08/11 Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft Tony Hansen
• 2010/08/11 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay Steve Atkins
• 2010/08/11 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay John C Klensin
• 2010/08/11 RE: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay John C Klensin
• 2010/08/11 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay Dave CROCKER
• 2010/08/11 Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft John C Klensin
• 2010/08/11 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay Steve Atkins
• 2010/08/11 RE: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay ned+ietf-smtp
• 2010/08/11 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay Dave CROCKER
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA SM
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Дилян Палаузов
• 2010/08/11 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay SM
• 2010/08/11 RE: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2010/08/11 Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft Dave CROCKER
• 2010/08/11 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay Tony Hansen
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Dave CROCKER
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Dave CROCKER
• 2010/08/11 RE: Processing after the end of DATA ned+ietf-smtp
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Dave CROCKER
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Paul Smith
• 2010/08/11 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay John C Klensin
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2010/08/11 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay John C Klensin
• 2010/08/11 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay Steve Atkins
• 2010/08/11 Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay Hector Santos
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Hector Santos
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Hector Santos
• 2010/08/11 Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay Dave CROCKER
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Dave CROCKER
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Tony Finch
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA John C Klensin
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2010/08/11 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Tony Finch
• 2010/08/10 Re: Processing after the end of DATA David MacQuigg
• 2010/08/10 Re: Processing after the end of DATA John C Klensin
• 2010/08/10 Re: Processing after the end of DATA John Levine
• 2010/08/10 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Robert A. Rosenberg
• 2010/08/10 Re: Processing after the end of DATA J.D. Falk
• 2010/08/10 Re: Processing after the end of DATA David MacQuigg
• 2010/08/10 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Dave CROCKER
• 2010/08/10 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Carl S. Gutekunst
• 2010/08/10 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Tony Finch
• 2010/08/10 Re: Processing after the end of DATA David MacQuigg
• 2010/08/10 RE: Processing after the end of DATA Rosenwald, Jordan
• 2010/08/10 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Nathaniel Borenstein
• 2010/08/10 Re: Processing after the end of DATA SM
• 2010/08/09 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Carl S. Gutekunst
• 2010/08/09 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Carl S. Gutekunst
• 2010/08/09 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Carl S. Gutekunst
• 2010/08/09 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Hector Santos
• 2010/08/09 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Hector Santos
• 2010/08/09 Re: Processing after the end of DATA ned+ietf-smtp
• 2010/08/09 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Hector Santos
• 2010/08/09 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Tony Hansen
• 2010/08/09 Re: Processing after the end of DATA ned+ietf-smtp
• 2010/08/09 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Hector Santos
• 2010/08/09 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Dave CROCKER
• 2010/08/09 Re: Processing after the end of DATA John Levine
• 2010/08/09 Re: Processing after the end of DATA John C Klensin
• 2010/08/09 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Carl S. Gutekunst
• 2010/08/09 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Dave CROCKER
• 2010/08/09 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Tony Hansen
• 2010/08/09 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Dave CROCKER
• 2010/08/09 Re: Processing after the end of DATA Steve Atkins
• 2010/08/09 Processing after the end of DATA Dave CROCKER
• 2010/07/31 Re: Yahoo Mail Filtering Hector Santos
• 2010/07/31 Re: Yahoo Mail Filtering Laura Atkins
• 2010/07/31 Re: Yahoo Mail Filtering Hector Santos
• 2010/07/21 Re: Yahoo Mail Filtering Hector Santos
• 2010/07/21 Re: Yahoo Mail Filtering J.D. Falk
• 2010/07/20 Re: Yahoo Mail Filtering Hector Santos
• 2010/07/20 Re: Yahoo Mail Filtering J.D. Falk
• 2010/07/20 Yahoo Mail Filtering Hector Santos
• 2010/07/20 Re: Yahoo Mail Filtering Дилян Палаузов
• 2010/06/10 Re: Historical moment: Marking a generational transition Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• 2010/06/10 Re: Historical moment: Marking a generational transition Ray Bellis
• 2010/06/10 Historical moment: Marking a generational transition Dave CROCKER
• 2010/05/23 Re: Edited Mail and Resent Headers Hector Santos
• 2010/05/23 Re: Edited Mail and Resent Headers ned+ietf-smtp
• 2010/05/21 Re: Edited Mail and Resent Headers Hector Santos
• 2010/05/21 Re: Edited Mail and Resent Headers Peter J. Holzer
• 2010/05/20 Re: Edited Mail and Resent Headers Hector Santos
• 2010/05/18 Re: Edited Mail and Resent Headers Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2010/05/17 RE: Edited Mail and Resent Headers Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2010/05/17 Edited Mail and Resent Headers Hector Santos
• 2010/05/14 Resent Headers and Online Mail Forums Hector Santos
• 2010/05/05 Re: Fwd: [ietf-dkim] ADSP discardable & discussion lists (was Re: Wrong Discussion - was Why mailing lists should strip DKIM signatures) Douglas Otis
• 2010/05/03 Fwd: [ietf-dkim] ADSP discardable & discussion lists (was Re: Wrong Discussion - was Why mailing lists should strip DKIM signatures) Dave CROCKER
• 2010/04/10 Re: blacklisting backscatter Sabahattin Gucukoglu
• 2010/04/10 Re: blacklisting backscatter John C Klensin
• 2010/04/10 Re: blacklisting backscatter David MacQuigg
• 2010/04/10 Re: blacklisting backscatter Rosenwald, Jordan
• 2010/04/10 Re: blacklisting backscatter ned+ietf-smtp
• 2010/04/10 Re: blacklisting backscatter Steve Atkins
• 2010/04/10 Re: blacklisting backscatter Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2010/04/10 Re: blacklisting backscatter Joerg Backschues
• 2010/04/10 blacklisting backscatter John Leslie
• 2010/04/02 Re: draft-macdonald-antispam-registry and interop Jeff Macdonald
• 2010/04/02 RE: draft-macdonald-antispam-registry and interop Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2010/04/01 Re: draft-macdonald-antispam-registry and interop Jeff Macdonald
• 2010/04/01 RE: draft-macdonald-antispam-registry and interop Murray S. Kucherawy
• 2010/04/01 draft-macdonald-antispam-registry and interop Jeff Macdonald
• 2010/03/30 some changes for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry Jeff Macdonald
• 2010/03/27 Re: Content-Transfer-Encoding list registry ned+ietf-smtp
• 2010/03/27 Content-Transfer-Encoding list registry Mikel Lindsaar
• 2010/03/27 Re: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00 Hector Santos
• 2010/03/27 RE: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00 ned+ietf-smtp
• 2010/03/26 Re: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00 Jeff Macdonald
• 2010/03/26 Re: New Version Notification for draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-00 Jeff Macdonald

• Earlier messages