Keith Moore wrote: > However, I am sympathetic to the argument that we can't keep revising > 2821bis forever, and that we need to push it out the door even if we > immediately start working on one or more fixes to 2821bis. Maybe we > should just accept that the "core" email specifications will never be > entirely current, even at the time they are published. > I'd certainly support publication of a short RFC that deprecated AAAA > fallback.
<sigh /> So that's it then, 2821bis-09 as is modulo some pending nits. Frank
