Dave Crocker writes:
Difficult to see how much more completely it can be explained that
this is out of scope for the current effort.
A supporting argument would help. Try a sentence like "keeping the same
rules as in 2821 is out of scope because ..." or better "adding AAAA to
the rule about A is in scope and appropriate because ...".
Arnt
- Re: Scope Creep Alex van den Bogaerdt
- Re: Scope Creep John Leslie
- Re: Scope Creep Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Registration model, 2821bis-06 Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06 Derek J. Balling
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06 Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06 Keith Moore
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06 Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06 Dave Crocker
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06 Keith Moore
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06 Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06 Dave Crocker
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06 Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06 ned+ietf-smtp
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06 John C Klensin
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06 Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06 Michael Storz
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06 Bill McQuillan
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06 Hector Santos
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06 SM
- Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06 Arnt Gulbrandsen