--On Thursday, 17 April, 2008 11:42 +0100 Tony Finch
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, John C Klensin wrote:
>> 
>> And, unless I misread your note, I think that puts us in
>> violent agreement.
> 
> Yes :-)
> 
> (Assuming that by "lower priority MX" you mean
> higher-numbered.)

Indeed.

    john





Reply via email to