On Sun, 2008-05-18, Dave Crocker wrote:
> I think it is worth distinguishing text that is secondary from normative text > that is being emphasized. So I'm inclined to agree that "NOTE:" should be > used for non-normative stuff. > That leaves the question of what convention is appropriate for marking > emphasized normative text. > I don't have a ready suggestion, so I thought I'd ask you folk...? How about "IMPORTANT:"? -- Bill McQuillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
