>More specifically, there can be legal requirements for all message >recipients to be listed in the header. Just putting in the address of >a mailing list is unaccepatable because the content of that list can >vary over time. Depending on the specific requirements in a given >jurisdiction, it may be necessary to expand the list into the header >- alternative schemes such as keeping a precide revision history for >the list, or accurate logs of message traffic, while technically OK, >may not be allosed. (These systems typically also impose draconian >restrictions on forwarding, but that's a separate matter.)
I can understand why each of the recipients might need to know who else got the message, but why would the list have to be in the header rather than, say, at the end of the message body? R's, John
