On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 05:26:12PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >IESG Secretary wrote: > >> The IESG received an appeal from John Klensin dated June 13, 2008. > >> This is a response to that appeal. > >> > >> 1. The appeal asked for the IESG to approve RFC2821bis. The > >> IESG came to consensus that the use of non-example domain names > >> should not prevent publication of RFC2821bis, even though the IESG > >> finds this practice can cause harm. The arguments made in public > >> list discussion of the appeal have been a factor in the IESG being > >> able to come to consensus on this point. > > >Quick poll: > > >John has said to me that he's always been willing to change the > >non-example domain names to 2606 example domain names. > > >Now that the appeal is done and out of the way, do people prefer > > >1) none of the domain names be changed? > >2) all domain names be changed, except Jon Postel's isi.edu and usc.edu > >references > >3) all domain names be changed > > Strongly prefer (1). (2) is tolerable. (3) is unacceptable and frankly > offensive.
I agree with Ned's position. keld
