In message <ebb53940f75e648cfd917...@[192.168.1.118]>, John C Klensin writes:
>
> Using this as a back door to get rid of SMTP clients that send
> mail from private address space directly into public Internet
> address space is a different problem. It just isn't the way to
> do that, independent of how desirable one might believe it to
> be. Even its desirability is in doubt give IPv4 address space
> shortages and the belief that we will be seeing ever more of
> those addresses in the coming years. If you want to pursue that
> option, please get the RIRs and the various network operations
> groups to sign off on it first.
It will be in more doubt when you throw in NAT64 and NAT46
as part of a IPv6 transition plan.
> I think I've now said about as much as I usefully can on this
> topic.
>
> john
>
>
>
>
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected]
