On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Paul Smith wrote: > > To me, it was (initially) 'clear' that the example saying 'such as the > argument to the EHLO command', was precise enough to imply that the fact > that the EHLO command was sent should not be discarded. It could have > said 'such as the EHLO command', but it went out of its way to say '*the > argument to* the EHLO command'.
But there's plenty of other information that the server has to discard - for example any AUTH results, any partial MAIL transactions - which isn't explicitly listed in RFC 3207. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD.
