SM, I gather the draft you're referring to is draft-moonesamy-senderid-spf-historic-00, which expired 6 months or so ago. You might consider issuing a -01 if you want to keep the issue active.
-Jim SM wrote: > > Hello, > > There is currently an I-D with a proposal to conclude the Sender ID > and SPF experiments. If anyone is interested in these Experimental > RFCs, I suggest that they work on an update and post it as an I-D. > That could help to put a stop to the Sender ID and SPF discussions > that point to problems when running both experiments concurrently. > > If you have any comments about why these Experimental RFCs should not > be moved to historic, I would like to hear them. > > Regards, > -sm > >
